[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH
    Alan Cox wrote:
    > On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 21:58, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    >>Since some processors now have "busy wait delay" instructions, this
    >>would also make it possible to do:
    > Nobody should be using an empty busy loop. If its a short timed busy
    > loop then they should be using udelay, if its a long one
    > schedule_timeout()


    > If its polling hardware then it isnt an empty loop

    True indeed as well, although we should still have a busy_wait(); macro
    that can insert whatever hint instruction the architecture might or
    might not have.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean