[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: large page patch (fwd) (fwd)

    On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Rob Landley wrote:
    > > Having a license that explicitly states that people who
    > > contribute and use Linux shouldn't sue you over it might
    > > prevent some problems.
    > Such a clause is what IBM insisted on having in ITS open source license. You
    > sue, your rights under this license terminate, which is basically automatic
    > grounds for a countersuit for infringement.

    Note that I personally think the "you screw with me, I screw with you"
    approach is a fine one. After all, the GPL is based on "you help me, I'll
    help you", so it fits fine.

    However, it doesn't work due to the distributed nature of the GPL. The FSF
    tried to do something like it in the GPL 3.0 discussions, and the end
    result was a total disaster. The GPL 3.0 suggestion was something along
    the lines of "you sue any GPL project, you lose all GPL rights". Which to
    me makes no sense at all - I could imagine that there might be some GPL
    project out there that _deserves_ getting sued(*) and it has nothing to do
    with Linux.


    (*) "GNU Emacs, the defendent, did inefariously conspire to play
    towers-of-hanoy, while under the guise of a harmless editor".

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.043 / U:16.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site