lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] tls-2.5.31-C3
From
Date
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 13:55, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On 12 Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > ugh, we do Linux interrupts while in the APM BIOS?
> >
> > We have to. Most APM bios expects interrupts to be happening. In
> > pre-emptive mode we may well even be switching to/from APM BIOS code in
> > 2.5 at the moment. I've not looked into that.
>
> i think that since we hold the APM spinlock (do we always, when calling
> into the APM BIOS?), we should not preempt any APM BIOS code.

Looking at the 2.5.29 tree I have handy here there is no APM spinlock. I
don't have 2.5.30/31 unpacked to check those



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.065 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site