[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.4.19 revert block_llseek behavior to standard
Rumor has it that on Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:20:57PM +0100 Alan Cox said:
> On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 17:06, Phil Auld wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> > I think this falls under the VFS umbrella, but I may be wrong.
> >
> > Below is a fix to make block_llseek behave as specified in the Single Unix Spec. v3.
> > ( It's extremely trivial but
> > may have political baggage.
> Political I don't see any. Technical - have you verified each of our
> block drivers behaves correctly when given an offset over its side, and
> that it correctly fails on a 32bit block wrap.

No, but how did it work prior to 2.4.11?

> I suspect we should still fail it with the allowed error code to be safe
> in 2.4

I may be missing something. How does tying a return of EINVAL to the size
necessarily imply the resulting offset will be negative? There is already
an explicit test for that.

Philip R. Auld, Ph.D. Technical Staff
Egenera Corp.
165 Forest St., Marlboro, MA 01752 (508)858-2600
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.043 / U:0.880 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site