lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: BKL removal
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 07:52:34PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Well, I certainly have the hardware to measure the difference. But, I
> seem to remember several conversations in the past where people didn't
> like this behavior.
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&threadm=linux.kernel.3C62DABA.3020906%40us.ibm.com

I think this is a very different philosophy. That's "well, this should
be a spinlock, but sometimes we sleep, and we don't want to think about
it too hard, so let's invent a magical lock". This is "sometimes we
don't hold semaphores for very long so we can improve performance by
spinning 1000 times before sleeping".

--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.187 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site