[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Input cleanups for 2.5.29 [2/2]
Alan Cox <> writes:

|> On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 22:55, Ben Pfaff wrote:
|> > 1 The typedef name intN_t designates a signed integer type with
|> > width N, no padding bits, and a two's complement
|> > representation. Thus, int8_t denotes a signed integer type
|> > with a width of exactly 8 bits.
|> And arbitary alignment requirements. At least I see nothing in C99
|> saying that
|> uint8_t foo;
|> uint8_t bar;
|> isnt allowed to give you interesting suprises

If it's part of a structure, then yes. The C standard has always allowed
arbitrary padding between structure members. It's an ABI issue.


Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs,
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean