[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] Input cleanups for 2.5.29 [2/2]
    Alan Cox <> writes:

    |> On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 22:55, Ben Pfaff wrote:
    |> > 1 The typedef name intN_t designates a signed integer type with
    |> > width N, no padding bits, and a two's complement
    |> > representation. Thus, int8_t denotes a signed integer type
    |> > with a width of exactly 8 bits.
    |> And arbitary alignment requirements. At least I see nothing in C99
    |> saying that
    |> uint8_t foo;
    |> uint8_t bar;
    |> isnt allowed to give you interesting suprises

    If it's part of a structure, then yes. The C standard has always allowed
    arbitrary padding between structure members. It's an ABI issue.


    Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs,
    SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
    Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
    "And now for something completely different."
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.045 / U:0.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site