Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Paul Mackerras <> | Date | Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:02:05 +1000 (EST) | Subject | superfluous hardirq_endlock in bh_action |
| |
It looks to me like the call to hardirq_endlock in bh_action is superfluous, since it doesn't match up with any hardirq_trylock call that I could see. Perhaps it should be removed?
Paul.
diff -urN linux-2.5/kernel/softirq.c pmac-2.5/kernel/softirq.c --- linux-2.5/kernel/softirq.c Sun Jul 28 22:47:57 2002 +++ pmac-2.5/kernel/softirq.c Mon Jul 29 12:29:34 2002 @@ -293,7 +293,6 @@ if (bh_base[nr]) bh_base[nr](); - hardirq_endlock(); spin_unlock(&global_bh_lock); return; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |