lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
Subjectsuperfluous hardirq_endlock in bh_action
It looks to me like the call to hardirq_endlock in bh_action is
superfluous, since it doesn't match up with any hardirq_trylock call
that I could see. Perhaps it should be removed?

Paul.

diff -urN linux-2.5/kernel/softirq.c pmac-2.5/kernel/softirq.c
--- linux-2.5/kernel/softirq.c Sun Jul 28 22:47:57 2002
+++ pmac-2.5/kernel/softirq.c Mon Jul 29 12:29:34 2002
@@ -293,7 +293,6 @@
if (bh_base[nr])
bh_base[nr]();

- hardirq_endlock();
spin_unlock(&global_bh_lock);
return;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.032 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site