Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:26:41 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] spinlock.h cleanup |
| |
On 29 Jul 2002, Robert Love wrote: > > Tested on UP, SMP, and preempt. Object code is unchanged. Patch is > against 2.5-bk but should apply to 2.5.29. Please, apply.
Hmm.. Why did you remove the gcc workaround? Are all gcc's > 2.95 known to be ok wrt empty initializers?
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |