[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] spinlock.h cleanup
       From: Robert Love <>
    Date: 29 Jul 2002 17:33:39 -0700

    On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 17:30, Robert Love wrote:

    > On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 17:26, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > Hmm.. Why did you remove the gcc workaround? Are all gcc's > 2.95 known to
    > > be ok wrt empty initializers?
    > If I recall correctly, the fix was for older egcs compilers.

    To better answer your question, I just checked and indeed it seems all
    gcc's >= 2.95 are OK.

    Some platforms (sparc64) are still using things like egcs-2.92.x
    vintage compilers as their main supported kernel build compiler.

    init/main.c allows 2.91 or greater to pass so that should be the rule
    enforced kernel wide.

    I don't remember when the empty initializer thing was fixed.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.020 / U:10.864 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site