[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Patch 2.5.25: Ensure xtime_lock and timerlist_lock are on difft cachelines
In message <> you write:
> This patch was not meant to be a definitive fix for do_gettimeofday.
> I thought having diffrent locks on the same cacheline was bad. Atleast,
> I don't think there'd be any negative performance impact due to my patch.
> Pls correct me if I am wrong.

Did you ever wonder why we don't declare spinlock to be ____cacheline_aligned?
While it's probably justified in this case, you pay for it in a slight
increase in size...

> I want to get some nos too .. and probably will...(still waiting for my
> turn to use the 4way here :-) ). But, I decided to post this patch
> as a follow up to the 2.5 profiler discussion on lse-tech.
> Anywayz, point taken. Next time I submit an optimization patch to you,
> I'll post the measuements too.


Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.045 / U:1.064 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site