![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, george anzinger wrote:
> >> > That may be a bug in preempt_count(), of course.> >> Didn't we just put bh_count and irq_count in the same
> word???
Yes. But that doesn't mean that the "preempt_count()" macro necessarily
needs to reflect that.
In particular, we have separate macros for getting the irq bits from that
shared word ("irq_count()" etc). Right now they happen to use the
"preempt_count()" macro, but that's not really fundamental.
No big deal either way, I suspect.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||