lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: using bitkeeper to backport subsystems?
    * Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com) [020722 17:26]:
    > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 12:29:05PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 12:27:05PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
    > > > * Christoph Hellwig (hch@lst.de) [020722 10:29]:
    > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 01:15:10AM -0600, Val Henson wrote:
    > > > > > Sigh. I hate this question: "How will BitKeeper make it easier to
    > > > > > port something between 2.4 and 2.5?" Answer: "Bk won't help - at
    > > > > > least not as much as it would help if 2.5 had been cloned from 2.4."
    > > > >
    > > > > 2.5 _is_ cloned from 2.4..
    > > >
    > > > can one make use of that somehow?
    > >
    > > /me ain't no bk guru.
    > >
    > > but I'd be interested in that, too.
    >
    > I'll try and write up how to do the backport thing later today (after
    > I have some coffee) but I wanted to answer this one.

    did you have coffee yet? i would really value your opinion of how
    to procede best. i do not expect bitkeeper to do the work on its
    own. I just hope to find a easy way to do the work repetitivly.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.055 / U:119.296 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site