[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruptionin2.5.27?]

On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> Since we're on the subject of preempt_schedule() being done at
> inappropriate times, I'm seeing it being called and panicking the
> machine before the per-cpu GDT, IDT, TSS, and LDT are loaded in
> cpu_init() and suspect that may be a wee bit too early to be sane.

i've fixed this in my tree: the init thread needs to start up with a
nonzero preempt_count, and schedule_init() sets it to 0. [schedule_init()
is the point after we can schedule.]


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.073 / U:1.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site