[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 'select' failure or signal should not update timeout

    On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote:
    > Typical soft real-time code looks a bit like this pseudo-code (excuse
    > the bugs :-):

    Yup, looks familiar.

    The thing is, we cannot change existing select semantics, and the question
    is whether what most soft-realtime wants is actually select, or whether
    people really want a "waittimeofday()".

    Like your example, the only uses I've had personally (DVD playback) have
    really had an empty select, so it wasn't really select itself that was
    horribly important.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.044 / U:53.688 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site