Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | | Date | Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:14:08 -0700 (PDT) | | From | Patrick Mochel <> | | Subject | Re: CPU detection broken in 2.5.27? |
| |
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 06:07:26PM +0200, Markus Pfeiffer wrote: > > > I just noticed that my /proc/cpuinfo states wrong or incomplete > > information about my processor. My PIII-1000M Processor is reported as > > 00/0B (Stepping?) > > Yep, I told Patrick about this last week sometime. The problem is > that only later Intels (from P4 onwards iirc) have the > name string cpuid function. Without which we need a table to > do the family/model/stepping translation to name strings. > > It's not that much work (and most of it already exists in the > kernels before the per-cpu split up).
Sorry about the delay in fixing this. The fix is really simple - just re-add the ID tables for PIIIs. I also added one for P4s, since mine wasn't getting automatically named. Though, I don't know what the code name for the model is, so it just shows up as "Pentium 4 (Unknown)"...
-pat
===== arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c 1.3 vs edited ===== --- 1.3/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c Wed Jul 10 03:46:31 2002 +++ edited/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c Tue Jul 23 12:04:48 2002 @@ -350,6 +350,24 @@ [8] "Mobile Pentium MMX" } }, + { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, + { + [0] "Pentium Pro A-step", + [1] "Pentium Pro", + [3] "Pentium II (Klamath)", + [5] "Pentium II (Deschutes)", + [6] "Mobile Pentium II", + [7] "Pentium III (Katmai)", + [8] "Pentium III (Coppermine)", + [10] "Pentium III (Cascades)", + [11] "Pentium III (Tualatin)", + } + }, + { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 15, + { + [1] "Pentium 4 (Unknown)", + } + }, }, c_init: init_intel, c_identify: generic_identify, - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |