[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: memory leak?
    Alan Cox <> writes:

    > > > This memory will be reclaimed when the system needs it.
    > >
    > > Does this mean that free and /proc/meminfo are incorrect?
    > By its own definition proc/meminfo is correct. top could go rummaging in
    > /proc/slabinfo but its questionable if it is meaningful to do so. The
    > actually "out of memory" case for a virtual memory system is not "no
    > memory pages free" nor "no memory or swap free" its closer to "working
    > set plus i/o buffers exceeds memory size".

    Why can't proc/meminfo report these caches as cached instead of plain
    used? Would that be incorrect somehow?

    Måns Rullgård
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.137 / U:62.792 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site