lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 2/9] 2.5.6 lm_sensors
On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

> Em Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:07:57AM +0100, Alan Cox escreveu:
> > On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 15:06, Albert Cranford wrote:
> > > Hello Linus,
> > > The i2c & lm_sensors group would like to submit these 9
> > > patches from our stable 2.6.3 package.
> >
> > Does this stuff still destroy thinkpads so badly they have to go back to
> > ibm for a non warranty repair ? Nobody seems willing to provide straight
> > answers, and I think they must be addressed before we merge such code
>
> Is there any other machine that is known to get fubar when using this code?
> Perhaps a THINKPAD_SUPPORT in "Processor Types and Features", like there is
> already for Toshiba and Dell laptops, that would disable the lm_sensors code,
> and besides I think that this code should be marked EXPERIMENTAL, so that
> users would be warned about these problems.

Anything short of "Destroy my precious Thinkpad? [y/N]" probably is
insufficient. Frankly, I don't think even that's enough. Once this is
mainlined, someone will want to build a kitchen sink distro kernel with
sensor support and if the code itself isn't autodetecting whether it's on
a problematic platform, it won't be long before someone boots their
Thinkpad off a friend's CDR and toasts it.

--
"Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.305 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site