Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:50:48 -0700 | From | "Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy" <> | Subject | Re: Closing a socket |
| |
> > I have implemented a new socket address family and have noted that > > from a multi-threaded application, if a thread calls close(fd) while a > > second thread has a blocking read outstanding, the sockets release() is not > > called. Is this correct? How can one unblock the read in order to do the > > close. You might want to implement shutdown(). Thread #1 will call shutdown() instead of the close(). Your shutdown() implementation can do something like: sk->shutdown |= RCV_SHUTDOWN; sk->state_change(sk); So, reader will wakeup, check shutdown mask and return error because socket was shut down.
Max
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |