lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Matti Aarnio wrote:

> These days, usually, the transaction database for MTAs is UNIX
> filesystem. For ZMailer I have considered (although not actually
> done - yet) using SleepyCat DB files for the transaction subsystem.
> There are great challenges in failure compartementalisation, and
> integrity, when using that kind of integrated database mechanisms.
> Getting SEGV is potentially _very_ bad thing!

Read: lethal to the spool. Has SleepyCat DB learned to recover from
ENOSPC in the meanwhile? I had a db1.85 file corrupt after ENOSPC once...

--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.527 / U:1.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site