Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:33:24 +0200 | From | Matthias Andree <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks |
| |
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> These days, usually, the transaction database for MTAs is UNIX > filesystem. For ZMailer I have considered (although not actually > done - yet) using SleepyCat DB files for the transaction subsystem. > There are great challenges in failure compartementalisation, and > integrity, when using that kind of integrated database mechanisms. > Getting SEGV is potentially _very_ bad thing!
Read: lethal to the spool. Has SleepyCat DB learned to recover from ENOSPC in the meanwhile? I had a db1.85 file corrupt after ENOSPC once...
-- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |