Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:22:54 -0400 (EDT) | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............ |
| |
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, David Weinehall wrote:
> Really, there is little reason to worry; my contribution to the > development of 2.5 (and a forthcoming 2.6/2.7/2.8/...) would probably > not be much larger were I to drop maintenance of the 2.0-tree. Possibly, > Marcello and Linus would receive a few more odd fixes for typos and > the Config-files, and maybe some MCA-related fixes, but as things stand > right now, the fact that I only have a dialup-connection stands between > me and serious development (<subliminal message>anyone care to sponsor a > faster connection or hire me?</subliminal message>)
Out of curiousity, just what will UML run? Can you run 2.0 kernels under UML? Older than that? Your mention about the pain of upgrading strikes home.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |