Messages in this thread | | | From | David Mosberger <> | Date | Mon, 15 Jul 2002 08:48:37 -0700 | Subject | Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible |
| |
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:24:11 +0100, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> said:
Russell> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:56:14AM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan Russell> wrote: >> Unfortunately, the hack must remain for another 4 years or so. >> Maybe that's not so bad though. I prefer it over this: >> >> #ifdef __386__ #define HZ 100 #endif #ifdef __IA64__ #define HZ >> 1024 #endif #ifdef __ARM__ #define HZ 128 // if they settle on >> this
Russell> Ehh? It's been 100 on the majority of ARM. If it's Russell> different in libproc, the libproc is broken.
libproc should be using AT_CLKTCK (as provided via sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK)) at any rate.
--david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |