[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: bzip2 support against 2.4.18
    On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:30:29AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > Actually, what is the use of even including 'bz2' in the name? Nobody
    > besides we geeks needs to know the thing is compressed with bzip2. It
    > would be nice to see the word 'linux' in there. How about bzlinux?
    > Just think of the hundreds of cases of carpal tunnel syndrome you'd
    > prevent by eliminating the shifted character.

    why not just call it 'linux'? file(1) exists for a reason, and the 'vm'
    prefix is a bit redundant these days

    also i've never really understood why the binary format of the kernel is
    selected via make. why not just make it a regular kernel option with a
    sane default? surely your average kernel compiling person picks
    something that works (zImage? bzImage? Image?) and sticks to it...


    toyota power:
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.020 / U:10.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site