[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: [RFC] dcache scalability patch (2.4.17)
    >On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Paul Menage wrote:
    >> - accessing foo/../bar, won't mark foo as referenced, even though it
    >> might be being referenced frequently. Probably not a common case for foo
    >> to be accessed exclusively in this way, but it could be fixed by marking
    >> a dentry referenced when following ".."
    >It certainly will. Look - until ->d_count hits zero referenced bit is
    >not touched or looked at. At all.
    >Look at the code. There is _no_ aging for dentries with positive ->d_count.
    >They start aging only when after they enter unused_list...

    Yes, but with the fastwalk lookup, accessing foo/../bar won't do a
    dget() for foo (assuming it was cached), and hence will never do a
    dput() on it either. So if the only references to foo are as foo/../bar
    then its d_count will stay zero and it will never be marked referenced.
    (Or am I missing something?)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.028 / U:9.460 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site