lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: jail() system call (was Re: prevent breaking a chroot() jail?)
* Shaya Potter (spotter@cs.columbia.edu) wrote:
> Wow, this is what I need. Would there be any interest in having this
> syscall in Linux, as I need to design something like this anyways for
> the research we are doing.
>
> A first stab implementation would probably be as a module (as our
> research is based on a being usable just as a loadable module, w/o any
> direct kernel patch need, therefore until something is accepted into the
> kernel, we would need it like this), but we'd prefer it, and it
> definitely would be cleaner to have the jail tests integrated into the
> syscall and not wrapped by the module.

You could implement this policy in a security module.
http://lsm.immunix.org.

I don't believe you can do all of jail() with just capabilities, and as
a module it can always be extended.

thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.058 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site