[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: HZ, preferably as small as possible
    At 02:28 PM 10/07/2002 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > But on the other hand, increasing HZ has perf/latency benefits, yes? Have
    > > these been quantified?
    >Not that I'm aware of. And I'd regard any such claims with some

    for one, i'm using a modified version of the network FIFO queue discipline
    to inject "delay" and "drop", similar to what ippipe can do on FreeBSD.
    given i'm using a kernel timer for this, HZ >= 1000 is essential for <1.5
    millisecond accuracy.

    perhaps we really need a high-speed timer mechanism for parts of the kernel
    that require it (or a highly-accurate single-fire timer)?



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.020 / U:6.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site