lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Futex Asynchronous Interface
    Hi,

    On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > Yes, some old-timers could argue that original UNIX didn't have sockets,

    Not to mention MULTICS...

    IMO this all looks like "exporting program variables to filesystem", would
    you do that? (Then we'll need /dev/memory/16k/5362337156/blah, etc.) The
    next issue would be "how do we stop other processes from using our
    sockets, semaphores, etc., ending up where we started.

    Sockets are a good implementation as long as they don't fall down for some
    particular purpose. This isn't given yet. Semaphores didn't yet fall down,
    either. So what do you want more? The "old" system might look crappy to
    you, but it works! It works, even if it's a little more abstract than the
    Plan-9. Are we Plan-9?

    Regards,
    Thunder

    PS. this mail was sent through a happily working lot of sockets.
    --
    German attitude becoming | Thunder from the hill at ngforever
    rightaway popular: |
    "Get outa my way, | free inhabitant not directly
    for I got a mobile phone!" | belonging anywhere
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site