[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Futex Asynchronous Interface

    On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > Yes, some old-timers could argue that original UNIX didn't have sockets,

    Not to mention MULTICS...

    IMO this all looks like "exporting program variables to filesystem", would
    you do that? (Then we'll need /dev/memory/16k/5362337156/blah, etc.) The
    next issue would be "how do we stop other processes from using our
    sockets, semaphores, etc., ending up where we started.

    Sockets are a good implementation as long as they don't fall down for some
    particular purpose. This isn't given yet. Semaphores didn't yet fall down,
    either. So what do you want more? The "old" system might look crappy to
    you, but it works! It works, even if it's a little more abstract than the
    Plan-9. Are we Plan-9?


    PS. this mail was sent through a happily working lot of sockets.
    German attitude becoming | Thunder from the hill at ngforever
    rightaway popular: |
    "Get outa my way, | free inhabitant not directly
    for I got a mobile phone!" | belonging anywhere

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.023 / U:192.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site