[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Futex Asynchronous Interface
    In message <> you wri
    > Do we have major and minor numbers for sockets and populate /dev
    > with them? No. And as a result, there has _never_ been any sysadmin
    > problems with either.

    Ummm... you don't do much network programming, do you Linus? Don't
    confuse familiarity with fondness: the socket API is *not* a good
    model to copy.

    > You already have to have a system call to bind the particular fd to the
    > futex _anyway_, so do the only sane thing, and allocate the fd _there_,
    > and get rid of that stupid and horrible /dev/futed which only buys you
    > pain, system administration, extra code, and a black star for being
    > stupid.

    Yet another special way to create a special fd? Hmm...

    That might be better than what I proposed, but it's not the epitomy of
    taste either.

    Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.021 / U:11.400 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site