[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Futex Asynchronous Interface
In message <> you wri
> Do we have major and minor numbers for sockets and populate /dev
> with them? No. And as a result, there has _never_ been any sysadmin
> problems with either.

Ummm... you don't do much network programming, do you Linus? Don't
confuse familiarity with fondness: the socket API is *not* a good
model to copy.

> You already have to have a system call to bind the particular fd to the
> futex _anyway_, so do the only sane thing, and allocate the fd _there_,
> and get rid of that stupid and horrible /dev/futed which only buys you
> pain, system administration, extra code, and a black star for being
> stupid.

Yet another special way to create a special fd? Hmm...

That might be better than what I proposed, but it's not the epitomy of
taste either.

Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.123 / U:11.556 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site