lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.20 IDE 85
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
> AFAICS, you just introduced some nasty list races in the interrupt
> handlers. You must hold the queue locks when calling
> blkdev_dequeue_request() and end_that_request_last(), for instance.
>

No. Please be more accurate. Becouse:

1. If anything I have made existing races only "obvious".

2. It is called in the context of do_ide_request or ide_raw_taskfile
where we already have the lock.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:1.054 / U:1.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site