Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:00:20 +0200 | From | Martin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5.20 IDE 85 |
| |
Jens Axboe wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > AFAICS, you just introduced some nasty list races in the interrupt > handlers. You must hold the queue locks when calling > blkdev_dequeue_request() and end_that_request_last(), for instance. >
No. Please be more accurate. Becouse:
1. If anything I have made existing races only "obvious".
2. It is called in the context of do_ide_request or ide_raw_taskfile where we already have the lock.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |