Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Jun 2002 04:33:29 -0600 | From | Erik Andersen <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel |
| |
On Mon Jun 03, 2002 at 06:12:11AM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > The problem here is the "quick glance" (no offense intended). The > most important part of a patent is its claims. In the case of the
no offense taken. I'm not a lawyer, so much beyond a quick glance teaches me very little when reading such things.
> any such RTOS need not even know Linux is there. All it needs to > know is that it has to call on adeos_suspend_domain() to go into > a dormant state when it doesn't have any more "ready" tasks. In > no way does it have a "Linux" task, as RTLinux and RTAI clearly > do.
Thanks much for the explanation -- that was exactly what I was hoping to see. Very very cool.
-Erik
-- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |