[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Question about sched_yield()

On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:45:55 -0400, Stevie O wrote:

>At 11:00 AM 6/18/2002 -0700, David Schwartz wrote:

>>This is the same error repeated again. Since you realize that an endless
>>loop on sched_yield is *not* equivalent to blocking, why do you then say
>>fact doing useful work"? By what form of ESP is the kernel supposed to
>>determine that the sched_yield task is not 'doing useful work' and the
>>task is?

>By this form of ESP: sched_yield() means "I have nothing better to do right
>now, give my time to someone who does". If a thread is doing useful work,
>why would it call sched_yield() ?!?

To give other threads a chance to do useful work too, perhaps because it
just released a mutex that other threads might need that it held for an
unusually long time.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.072 / U:3.380 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site