[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: KBuild 2.5 Impressions

    No matter if ya'll reply, but a few things to be mentioned:

    On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Ion Badulescu wrote:
    > However, having both in the tree can mean only one of a few things:

    5. the better will stay, the worse will be pulled from the tree.

    > Also, don't say 'well you need the core to do this and that', it only shows
    > that you don't understand the core and you're treating it like a black box.
    > Once you do understand it, you'll see there are many ways to break it up
    > feature-wise.

    But other features require parts of the thing you call core which won't
    get in because they look silly without the stuff that is using it. Who
    needs a loose mdbm?

    ship is leaving right on time | Thunder from the hill at ngforever
    empty harbour, wave goodbye |
    evacuation of the isle | free inhabitant not directly
    caveman's paintings drowning | belonging anywhere

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.029 / U:3.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site