[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: KBuild 2.5 Impressions

No matter if ya'll reply, but a few things to be mentioned:

On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> However, having both in the tree can mean only one of a few things:

5. the better will stay, the worse will be pulled from the tree.

> Also, don't say 'well you need the core to do this and that', it only shows
> that you don't understand the core and you're treating it like a black box.
> Once you do understand it, you'll see there are many ways to break it up
> feature-wise.

But other features require parts of the thing you call core which won't
get in because they look silly without the stuff that is using it. Who
needs a loose mdbm?

ship is leaving right on time | Thunder from the hill at ngforever
empty harbour, wave goodbye |
evacuation of the isle | free inhabitant not directly
caveman's paintings drowning | belonging anywhere

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.076 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site