Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Replace timer_bh with tasklet | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 19 Jun 2002 19:15:34 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 19:01, David S. Miller wrote:
> That isn't in the tree now. We can only make analsis of the patch > based upon what is in 2.5.x right now, you can't base it on what > might be added in the future.
Could there possibly be any interaction between SERIAL_BH and TIMER_BH?
I guess my stance is if each BH-removal patch figures out its syncronization issues, each should be fine regardless of what the other BHs do.
The timer_bh runs often but touches a comprehensible amount of data.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |