Messages in this thread | | | From | <> | Subject | RE: Question about sched_yield() | Date | Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:05:36 -0700 |
| |
> Your assumptions are just plain wrong. The yielder is being nice, so it > should get preferential treatment, not worse treatment. All threads are > ready-to-run all the time. Yielding is not the same as blocking or lowering > your priority.
In other words, the more you yield, the nicer you are and the more CPU you get, and those nasty processes that are trying to actually use the CPU to do something with it and wear it down should get it as little as possible. I get it.
- Mgix
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |