[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 3x slower file reading oddity
    On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

    > On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 01:03:15PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
    > > 3x slower with the two cats in parallel.
    > cat uses an incredibly small buffer for file io (4KB on x86), so
    > running multiple cats in parallel will simply thrash your disk.
    > What you really want is to run the open()s in parallel and the
    > read()s sequentially (or in parallel with a large buffer to cut
    > down on the seek cost).

    using a 64KB buffer makes the xargs -P2 only twice as long as the -P1 ...
    so that's an improvement, but still something seems odd. (btw, many of
    the files are tiny anyhow -- a bunch of maildirs mixed in amongst the

    i'll try playing around with threading the open()s.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.021 / U:20.572 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site