Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [CHECKER] 37 stack variables >= 1K in 2.4.17 | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 12 Jun 2002 15:44:16 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 15:38, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Perfection isn't what I'm looking for, rather just an approximation. > Any tool would have to give up on non-trivial recursion, or have > additional rules imposed on the system. Checker seems to be growing > functionality in this area, so it seems like a useful feature request.
I do not want to give up on this idea, either... if the implementation needs to be "hackish" or even explicitly ignore certain functions, so be it. There is a _lot_ that can be done with detailed call chain analysis -- the point you gave is one of many.
Checker already has some basic functionality here I suspect based on what it is capable of reporting... imagine what more could be reported?
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |