Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:42:51 +0200 | From | Martin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19 |
| |
Użytkownik Russell King napisał: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote: > >>Użytkownik Russell King napisał: >> >>>GCC 3.x introduces the dodgy practice of removing the frame pointer >>>from every function despite telling the compiler not to with >>>-fno-omit-frame-pointer. It's also contary to the GCC documentation >>>when it interferes with debugging. >> >>This can not be true - since otherwise task switching wouldn't work >>at all! > > > It is indeed true. From your comment, it looks like you don't understand > the ARM architecture/what a frame pointer is.
Well I surely understand what a pointer to the local variable set is. I know pascal and gdb well enough :-). However what I may have missed is that ARM is using some other task switch mechanism. I would be courious to see what it is?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |