Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_NR_CPUS, redux | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 11 Jun 2002 11:19:34 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:09, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> I don't know what is "typical" for non-x86, but for x86, why not > use something more like a 'typical' NR_CPUS for SMP, like 8 (?)... > why still waste all of that memory?
Well right now we set it to 32...
I think out-of-the-box Linux, with SMP set, should support the maximum number of CPUs. While we do save some memory I do not think it is going to be huge with 8 vs 32.
But whatever you, Linus, and the arch maintainers say... all my boxen are 2-way so I don't care ;)
> What was this problem? I missed it but would like to see it. > (or do you know what the Subject: was?)
Not sure to be honest. The subject was "[patch] CONFIG_NR_CPUS"
Or ask Andrew...
> One spello (typo) below. > > | + mimimum value which makes sense is 2.
(cough) someone else wrote that ;)
Fixed, thanks.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |