Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 09 May 2002 02:49:12 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: khttpd rotten? | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:23:00 +0100
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:39:42PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > Right. If khttpd had been pulled from 2.4.17, I would have > had weeks of warning that khttpd is unstable; instead, I learned > only when someone started doing his own stress testing, and I > have little time to fix it. I say pull it from > 2.4.19-pre9. Marcello, put it out of its misery asap, please... > it'd time for khttpd to become a standalone patch again. Okay, what about the following:
Are you willing to start being the khttp maintainer?
I have not seen updates or any attempts at maintaining the thing in about 2 years. Basically, since it went into the tree.
If we aren't changing that situation, we are not removing the impetus for taking khttpd out of the tree entirely. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |