[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: khttpd rotten?
   From: Christoph Hellwig <>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:23:00 +0100

On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:39:42PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Right. If khttpd had been pulled from 2.4.17, I would have
> had weeks of warning that khttpd is unstable; instead, I learned
> only when someone started doing his own stress testing, and I
> have little time to fix it. I say pull it from
> 2.4.19-pre9. Marcello, put it out of its misery asap, please...
> it'd time for khttpd to become a standalone patch again.

Okay, what about the following:

Are you willing to start being the khttp maintainer?

I have not seen updates or any attempts at maintaining the
thing in about 2 years. Basically, since it went into the

If we aren't changing that situation, we are not removing
the impetus for taking khttpd out of the tree entirely.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.237 / U:2.084 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site