[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: khttpd rotten?
       From: Christoph Hellwig <>
    Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:23:00 +0100

    On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:39:42PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
    > Right. If khttpd had been pulled from 2.4.17, I would have
    > had weeks of warning that khttpd is unstable; instead, I learned
    > only when someone started doing his own stress testing, and I
    > have little time to fix it. I say pull it from
    > 2.4.19-pre9. Marcello, put it out of its misery asap, please...
    > it'd time for khttpd to become a standalone patch again.

    Okay, what about the following:

    Are you willing to start being the khttp maintainer?

    I have not seen updates or any attempts at maintaining the
    thing in about 2 years. Basically, since it went into the

    If we aren't changing that situation, we are not removing
    the impetus for taking khttpd out of the tree entirely.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.022 / U:74.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site