![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:29:43AM -0700, Vikram wrote: > > > > > How would this be better than MOSIX, or other clustering solutions? > > > > Any URLs you may have on this would be quite helpful. > > uh-huh, you miss the pt maybe? uml offers a great testing, debugging, > developing platform. the whole idea is to replace the real thing (say like > kernel devel) with UML and your qn is more like why cant we use the real > thing itself....:) If you want to test clustering (or "UML SMP over several seperate hosts" -JDike) with UML, why not just create a UML kernel with the clustering support (ie, MOSIX) in that UML kernel? Really, I'm just asking what the benifit is to use UML for clustering as oposed to MOSIX. I can think of one, testing NUMA without special hardware... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:22 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||