Messages in this thread | | | From | Denis Vlasenko <> | Subject | Re: [prepatch] address_space-based writeback | Date | Fri, 3 May 2002 13:35:08 -0200 |
| |
On 2 May 2002 06:49, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > >And I recently moved my /usr/src to separate partition. > >That is, /usr/src is now a mount point. > >I have to export it in NFS exports *and* mount it *on every workstation* > >(potentially thousands of wks!). > > Yes, edit /etc/fstab. My file server has loads of partitions and it exports > them all and /etc/fstab on all clients just mounts them all. Problem being?
Problem is that I have to modify /etc/fstab on every workstation.
> >I'll repeat myself. What if some advanced fs has no sensible way of > >generating inode? Does it have to 'fake' it, just like [v]fat does it now? > >(Yes, vfat is not 'advanced' fs, let's not discuss it...) > > They have to fake it yes. Otherwise all existing userspace utilities will > break. And no they cannot be changed otherwise they would no longer work > on non-Linux platforms and most utilities are UNIX utilities which work on > everything including Linux. You don't want to break that.
It seems to me like the Bad Thing which is too old and traditional to change. :-(
> That would break UNIX semantics. Which it seems is exactly what you want to > do... I don't think you will find many supporters of that idea... As Linus > pointed out to me the inode is the basic i/o entity in UNIX and hence > Linux. And that is not going to change...
Yes, it isn't going to change. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |