[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: business models [was patent stuff]
    On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 09:57, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > On Tuesday 28 May 2002 09:53, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
    > > And BTW I'm OK with patents as long as their licensed for free to GPLed
    > > software (maybe add a clause that makes this irreversable?).
    > Indeed, an irreversible license is essential, but that's not all. Not
    > only must the GPL be accommodated, but all open source licenses. And it
    > is not enough to be free as in "without cost": it must also be free of
    > additional restrictions.

    I don't think you can realistically expect all open source licenses like
    the BSD one to be accomodated. Otherwise people would ship binary apps
    linked with a BSD licensed libpatent.o/c that was useless to anyone. The
    GPL restrictions happen to work very nicely in terms of making a patent
    available for free software (or one definition thereof), the BSD license
    alas doesn't.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.025 / U:8.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site