Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 May 2002 19:08:33 -0700 | From | Wim Coekaerts <> | Subject | Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? |
| |
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:18:54PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > If we could get the apps (well, Oracle) to co-operate, we could just use > clone ;-) Having this transparent for shmem segments would be really nice.
Except that we fork() from different areas, eg at startup, or from the listener process once things are up, or directly through a locally running client etc. so it's not just using clone() and done...
Altho we probably should have a look at it, maybe someone already did, will check it out.
Wim
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |