lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)]
    On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 08:26:12PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
    > > "application" needs to use the RT/Linux patent in order to work, it
    > > either has to buy a license or be GPLed.
    >
    > But this is an ADDITIONAL restriction, which violates the GPL, which
    > is the base of the RTL code, or isn't it?

    Don't mix the GPL and the patent rules, they are not the same thing.
    To the extent that RTL code is derived from GPLed code, it has to
    obey the GPL, that's true. But the patent does not have to obey the
    GPL, one are is copyright law (that's what covers the GPL) and the
    other is patent law.

    FSMlabs can make any rules they want for their license of their patent.
    The fact that the GPL doesn't want additional restrictions has no bearing
    on the patent law.

    > > Maybe Victor should have used a different model: if no money changes hands,
    > > then it's free to use the patent, if money changes hand, FSMlabs wants a
    >
    > Define "if money changes hand". Let's say I develop a smart
    > controller software for disk drives, and I give it (maybe for money,
    > maybe for free, maybe under GPL or not) to IBM and Maxtor and
    > Seagate. The disk manufacturers make modifications to the code, and
    > embed it into their disk drives. Then they sell the drives to Dell
    > and HP and ... Those sell PCs to many, many vendors, who sell the PCs
    > to you and men and ...

    Definitely "money changed hands".

    > > cut. I think that was the intent, but as with all things, it's hard to
    > > state that clearly in a legal document. If that was the intent, I support
    > > it, I think it's perfectly reasonable.
    >
    > If that was the case, Victor should have been able to explain his
    > intentions to anybody in public. Why did he never do that? But spread
    > FUD instead?

    Well, as someone who has been working in a somewhat similar manner, I can
    say that there is a very unhealthy tendency for the free software community
    to be fanatical and somewhat self destructive on these topics. There are
    piles of people who want to make money off of your work and have absolutely
    no intention in sharing that money. And they get pissed as hell when you
    figure out a way to force them to share that money. After a while, you
    get pretty sick of people yelling at you and you just start to ignore them.
    I've spoken with Victor about this topic a few times and while I will not
    speak for him in specifics, I will say he's equally unthrilled with a lot
    of what gones on. It's tiresome.
    --
    ---
    Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.023 / U:149.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site