lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again
    > I assume that you mean by "not worth using x86" you're referring to say,
    > degraded performance over other platforms? Well...if you talk
    > price/performance, using x86 is perfect in those terms since you can buy
    > more boxes and have a more fluid architecture, rather than building a
    > monolithic system. Monolithic systems aren't always the best. Just look
    > at Fermilab!

    Well, to be honest, with the current mainline kernel on >4Gb x86 machines,
    we're not talking about slow performance on mainline kernel, we're talking
    about "falls flat on it's face, in a jibbering heap" (if you actually stress the
    machine with real workloads). If we apply a bunch of patches, we can get
    the ostritch to just about fly (most of the time), but we're working towards good
    performance too ... it's not that far off.

    Of course, this means that we actually have to get these patches accepted
    for them to be of much use ;-). -aa kernel works best in this area, on the
    workloads I've been looking at so far ... this area is very much "under active
    development" at the moment.

    M.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.025 / U:62.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site