Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 May 2002 11:10:46 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5.17 /dev/ports |
| |
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > ... and while we are at flamewar-mongering, none of these files have any > > business being in procfs. > > That depends on how you define procfs. Linux is not Plan 9. A lot of it > certainly is going to cleaner with a devicefs and sysctlfs
OK, let me put it that way:
none of these files has any business bringing the rest of procfs along for a ride and none of them has any reason to use any code from fs/proc/*.c
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |