[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Bug with shared memory.
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> With memclass_related_bhs() we automatically maximixed the amount of ram
> available as inodes/indirects and everything else ZONE_NORMAL, after

OK, a question and a remark:

1) does memclass_related_bhs() work if the bufferheads are
on another node ? (NUMA-Q)

2) memclass_related_bhs() will definately not work if the
data structure is pinned indirectly, say struct address_space
which is pinned by mere the existance of the page cache page
and cannot easily be freed

> > or three, so he may not see your words.
> Ok. We CC'ed Rik so I assume it won't get lost in the mail flood.

I'm on holidays, don't expect patches soon :)

Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.086 / U:9.460 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site