[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Bug with shared memory.
    On Mon, 20 May 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    > With memclass_related_bhs() we automatically maximixed the amount of ram
    > available as inodes/indirects and everything else ZONE_NORMAL, after

    OK, a question and a remark:

    1) does memclass_related_bhs() work if the bufferheads are
    on another node ? (NUMA-Q)

    2) memclass_related_bhs() will definately not work if the
    data structure is pinned indirectly, say struct address_space
    which is pinned by mere the existance of the page cache page
    and cannot easily be freed

    > > or three, so he may not see your words.
    > Ok. We CC'ed Rik so I assume it won't get lost in the mail flood.

    I'm on holidays, don't expect patches soon :)

    Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.021 / U:283.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site