Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: Htree directory index for Ext2, updated | Date | Sat, 18 May 2002 08:22:56 +0200 |
| |
On Saturday 18 May 2002 07:58, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On May 18, 2002 07:44 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > - I can apply patches to bitkeeper repository using the normal 'patch', > > but Bitkeeper gets its revenge later, as each bk edit command starts > > off by throwing away the patch. > > This is also strange, as when I use patch to apply a patch to files not > checked out, patch asks me if I should check them out in write mode > (which I do, of course). > > Of course, if you are using patch to apply changes to a BK tree it isn't > really BK in the end. What I was referring to was importing a changeset > would probably get the target files correct 100% of the time, unlike the > situation you are describing with patch.
The solution to this appears to be to apply the patch with -g1. With -g0, strange things happen, as described above.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |