Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 May 2002 22:12:32 -0400 (EDT) | From | Gerhard Mack <> | Subject | Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel |
| |
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> you're right if we need a make clean it's because the buildsystem is > broken. However one thing that happens all the time to me, is that I > change an header like mm.h or sched.h and ~everything needs to be > rebuilt then. And since I cannot trust the current buildsystem I need to > `make clean` first just in case somebody is getting mm.h included > implicitly and fastdep so cannot notice it has to rebuild such object > too. But in such case make clean doesn't hurt much because almost > everything needs to be rebuilt anyways. Now the only regression I can > see is that kbuild was quite slower in compiling the kernel from scrach > (so I suspect that for me after editing mm.h it would take more time > with kbuild2.5 to reach the vmlinux generation than it took with the old > buildsystem after the make clean) Is that the case, or did you improved > the performance of kbuild recently?
recently==a month ago.
Gerhard
-- Gerhard Mack
gmack@innerfire.net
<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |