[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Changelogs on
    Generally the defense that "no one else is saying anything" is not a
    good one - especially b/c it opens up a huge space for others to agree
    with the original argument. And yes, they are illegible.

    In fact, I believe that when things originally moved to BK, there was
    some discussion that although it was a step in the right direction, it
    needed to be cleaned up a little bit.


    On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 21:09, john slee wrote:
    > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:07:09AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
    > > I dont know who to write to about this, but the changelogs for
    > > 2.4.19-pre on are COMPLETELY illegible.
    > you seem to be the only one publicly complaining. go write a procmail
    > recipe to fix them up.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.021 / U:16.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site