lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: C++ and the kernel
From
Date
commence  Chris Friesen quotation:

> "Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
>> Making code "cleaner" is a matter of perspective.
>>
>> class A {
>> public: void func(char *st) { cout << st << endl; }
>> };
>> using A::func;
>> A a;
>> a.func("Hello World!");
>>
>> Is not all that clean. In fact, I'm not sure I have it right. It's
>> easier and clearer to write puts("Hello World!");
>
> Your example is needlessly complex, and I'm sure you know this. A more
> realistic comparison would be:
>
> cout << "Hello World!\n";

And of course standard libraries are not available in the kernel, so
you'll most likely end up calling printk anyway in your C++ kernel
code.

--
///////////////// | | The spark of a pin
<sneakums@zork.net> | (require 'gnu) | dropping, falling feather-like.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | | There is too much noise.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site